Comment on Szasz' "Pharmacracy"
Letter to Reason
4/15/03
Reason Magazine
To the Editor:
Quoted in Jacob Sullum’s review of Pharmacracy: Medicine and Politics in America, Thomas Szasz writes that “Attributing mental illnesses, such as addiction and panic disorder, to biological alterations occurring at a ‘subcellular level’ is a parody of the denial of free will, choice, and responsibility".
Free Will Panic
Psychiatry’s dark secret
by Sheldon Richman
2/28/03, Manchester Times
Time magazine recently published its annual cover story on health, focusing on the relationship between mind and body. To its credit, it contains some rarely heard criticisms of the mental-health laws, which nearly everyone accepts as appropriate in the land of the free.
Absolution for Addicts
Using the causal story behind addiction to combat stigma and discrimination
Join Together is to be congratulated for convening a national policy panel on discrimination and addiction, and for the resulting report, which highlights important changes that should be made in policies involving those in recovery.
The Buck Stops -- Where? Living Without Ultimate Moral Responsibility
“You sound to me as though you don’t believe in free will,” said Billy Pilgrim.
“If I hadn’t spent so much time studying Earthlings,” said the Tralfamadorian, “I wouldn’t have any idea what was meant by free will. I’ve visited thirty-one inhabited planets in the universe, and I have studied reports on one hundred more. Only on Earth is there any talk of free will.”
-- Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughterhouse–Five
Losing Faith in Free Will
More Than Good Intentions: Holding Fast to Faith in Free Will
by John Horgan, New York Times, December 31, 2002
When I woke this morning, I stared at the ceiling above my bed and wondered: to what extent will my rising really be an exercise of my free will? Let's say I got up right . . . now. Would my subjective decision be the cause? Or would computations unfolding in a subconscious neural netherworld actually set off the muscular twitches that slide me out of the bed, quietly, so as not to wake my wife, and propel me toward the door?
What Justifies Retribution, Precisely?
In what sense do people deserve to suffer once we see that their character and behavior are entirely the result of genetic and environmental factors that they didn’t choose? Why shouldn’t we, instead of relentlessly and punitively imposing “just deserts,” address these factors, and so make criminality less likely without unnecessary suffering?
Science and Freedom
Mainstream science supports a physicalist understanding of human beings and their behavior which challenges traditional notions of self and free will. But a fully naturalistic, science-based view of ourselves nevertheless provides a robust basis for morality, while pointing the way toward humane revisions in our responsibility practices.
An article published in Free Inquiry (link is external), Spring 2002.
Addiction: Choices and Cravings
Despite concerted efforts by treatment professionals to change public perceptions of drug addiction, stigma against addicts remains widespread. According to the National Treatment Plan Initiative recently released by the U.S. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), stigma can "cause ostracism, shame, and even denial of life’s necessities – such as employment and a place to live – for which the person in recovery is fully deserving."


